WNBA Denounces Ex-NBA Players' Bad-Faith Bid to Enter Women's Draft

Mr. QMr. Q
Share:
Spacious gym with volleyball net and basketball hoop, ideal for sports activities.

The WNBA issued a blunt rebuke this week after two retired NBA players said they'd try to enter the 2027 WNBA draft by simply declaring themselves women, calling the maneuver exactly what it is: a "bad-faith" attempt to weaponize the league's eligibility language against trans people.

Two Retirees, One Punchline

Freedom, who last played in 2022, announced on X on August 7 that he was "officially declaring" his eligibility for the WNBA's April 2027 draft, arguing the league's rules only require self-identification. He followed up with a video of himself signing paperwork and another captioned "Let 'The Transition' begin," while insisting he wasn't trying to "mock, make fun of or disrespect any community."

Royce White, a former NBA player now running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, took a cruder approach. "I'm transgender. I'm a woman. I identify as sometimes identifying as a woman for purpose of basketball," he told Fox News, adding that he wants "fair treatment" and has threatened a "huge legal battle" if he's not allowed to try out. He's since done a round of right-wing media hits in a blonde wig.

There are no immediate eligibility matters affecting the WNBA, and we strongly denounce the bad-faith efforts to use these topics to demean or marginalize others.

WNBA spokesperson

A One-Sentence Policy Under Pressure

The WNBA's collective bargaining agreement contains exactly one line on the subject: "Only players who are women are eligible to play in the WNBA." It doesn't define womanhood, reference gender identity, or mention sex assigned at birth. In practice, the league has handled trans and nonbinary eligibility case by case rather than through a published policy, and no trans woman has ever appeared on a WNBA roster. Layshia Clarendon, who is transgender and nonbinary, remains the only openly trans player in league history, and current players have publicly defended trans athletes' right to compete.

That vagueness is exactly what White and Freedom claim to be exploiting, but it exists in a vacuum: there is no actual trans athlete currently trying to declare for the 2027 draft. Part of that is structural. The NCAA, a major pipeline to the WNBA, barred trans women from women's college sports after a February 2025 Trump executive order, and many states already exclude trans girls and women from school basketball entirely.

The Bigger Picture

The stunt lands amid a broader tightening of the rules governing women's sports. The Supreme Court's 2026 ruling in West Virginia v. B.P.J. let schools exclude trans women from female teams based on sex, and the International Olympic Committee adopted a policy this year limiting women's Olympic events to "biological females." FIBA, basketball's global governing body, said in April it would follow the IOC's lead, though it's still gathering "basketball-specific" evidence before finalizing anything ahead of 2027. The Heritage Foundation, the conservative think tank behind much of this legislative push, has made trans athlete bans a signature cause.

The controversy also didn't emerge in a vacuum inside the league. Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham's recent comments calling a ban on trans women in women's sports "common sense" drew both support from prominent conservative figures and backlash from trans-rights advocates, along with disruptive in-person protests at games. The task force meeting that produced Wednesday's statement was convened specifically to address that online vitriol and player harassment, not to write new eligibility rules; a source told Sports Business Journal the group plans to keep meeting with "stakeholders," including players, in the coming months.

MQ's Take

There's a difference between asking honest questions about eligibility rules and staging a bit designed to humiliate an entire group of people who aren't even part of the story. White and Freedom aren't trans athletes navigating an unclear policy; they're cis men using "self-identification" as a punchline, then acting wounded when they're called out for it. The WNBA's response was measured, but it named the tactic correctly: bad faith. The real policy conversation, about medical criteria, fairness, and how leagues actually treat the handful of trans athletes who exist, deserves better than a Senate candidate in a wig.

Sources: them., PinkNews, The Advocate

Cover photo: Görkem Cetinkaya / Pexels

Share:

Related Articles

Comments

Leave a Comment

Your email will not be published.